carbonel: Beth wearing hat (Default)
[personal profile] carbonel
The air conditioner people have come and gone, I am $2500 poorer, and cool air is coming out of the vents.

The thermostat is resolutely sitting at 79 degrees Fahrenheit, though. I suppose a house this large has a lot of inertia, or whatever the correct term is when talking about resistance to temperature change.

Date: 2004-09-03 06:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-erikvolso370.livejournal.com
Thermal inertia works.

Trick I learned in St. Louis. When spring threatens to turn to summer, I crank the AC to "Jesus Christ" and drop the house to 65F for three or four days -- then, when the heat hits, I roll it up to 76F, and it stays cool for weeks.

Of course, my place is brick, so there's lots of mass to cool or warm.

Date: 2004-09-05 04:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com
The qustion is: which takes less energy? Does it take less energy to cool a house to 65 and then let is slowly warm up, or maintain the house at a less-cool 70 or so?

I don't know. My guess is that it depends on a whole lot of other factors.

B

Profile

carbonel: Beth wearing hat (Default)
carbonel

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 25th, 2026 01:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios